Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of included studies

From: Performance of ultrasonography screening for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author, year

Country

Age, years

PerDB, %

Type of US

Sample size

Screening mode

Exclusion of BC

Blinding

Complete data

BIRADS criteria

FU, months

Quality assessment

Cohort type

Supplemental US screening studies

 Tagliafico, 2016 [21]

Italy [21]

51

100

HHUS

3231

Community

Yes

–

Yes

No

< 12

Fair

Prospective

 Kim, 2016 [22]

South Korea

NR

100

HHUS

3171

Opportunistic

Yes

–

Yes

No

12

Fair

Retrospective

 Weigert, 2015 [26]

United States

NR

100

HHUS

10,282

Opportunistic

NR

–

Yes

Yes

6

Fair

Retrospective

 Hwang, 2015  [25]

South Korea

50

78

HHUS

1727

Opportunistic

No

–

No

Yes

12

Fair

Retrospective

 Moon, 2015 [24]

South Korea

53

64

HHUS

2005

Opportunistic

NR

–

Yes

Yes

24

Fair

Retrospective

 Parris, 2013 [28]

United States

52

100

HHUS

5519

Opportunistic

No

–

Yes

Yes

NR

Fair

Retrospective

 Girardi, 2013 [27]

Italy

51

45

HHUS

22,131

Opportunistic

No

–

Yes

Yes

NR

Fair

Retrospective

 Leong, 2012 [32]

Singapore

45

100

HHUS

106

Community

No

–

Yes

No

12–24

Fair

Prospective

 Hooley, 2012 [31]

United States

52

100

HHUS

648

Opportunistic

No

–

Yes

Yes

> 15

Fair

Retrospective

 Corsetti, 2011 [33]

Italy

NR

100

HHUS

3356

Opportunistic

Yes

–

Yes

No

12

Fair

Retrospective

 Youk, 2011 [34]

South Korea

48

100

HHUS

446

Opportunistic

No

–

Yes

Yes

24

Fair

Retrospective

 Brancato, 2007 [36]

Italy

52

100

HHUS

5227

Opportunistic

NR

–

Yes

Yes

NR

Fair

Prospective

Joint screening studies

 Dong, 2017 [9]

China

52

44

HHUS

31,918

Community

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

12

High

Prospective

 Ohuchi, 2016 [10]

Japan

44

NR

HHUS

36,752

Community

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

12

High

Prospective

 Berg, 2016 [11]

United States

55

100

HHUS

2662

High-risk

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

> 12

High

Prospective

 Shen, 2015 [23]

China

46

NR

HHUS

4135

High-risk

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

12

High

Prospective

 Brem, 2015 [39]

United States

53

100

ABUS

15,318

Community

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

12

High

Prospective

 Huang, 2012 [30]

China

46

48

HHUS

3028

Opportunistic

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

12

High

Prospective

 Kelly, 2010 [40]

United States

53

68

ABUS

4419

High-risk

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

12

High

Prospective

 Wilczek, 2016 [38]

Sweden

50

100

ABUS

1668

Community

Yes

No

Yes

No

24

Fair

Prospective

 Venturini, 2013 [29]

Italy

46

55

HHUS

1666

Community

Yes

No

No

Yes

6

Fair

Prospective

 Weinstein, 2009 [35]

United States

49

60

HHUS

609

High-risk

No

Yes

No

Yes

12

Fair

Prospective

 Honjo, 2007 [37]

Japan

NR

NR

HHUS

3453

Community

NR

Yes

Yes

No

≥18

Fair

Prospective

  1. PerDB Percent of women with dense breasts accounted for the whole population; US Ultrasonography; BC Breast cancer; BIRADS Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System; FU Follow-up; HHUS/ABUS Hand-held / automated breast ultrasonography