Skip to main content

Table 3 Summary of barriers and facilitators regarding the feasibility of treating CRF in supportive care in hospital environments in the views of the stakeholders

From: Experiences and views of different key stakeholders on the feasibility of treating cancer-related fatigue

 

Barriers

Facilitators

Assessment

No standard diagnostic tool

Standard diagnostic tool

No systematic CRF assessment

Systematic CRF assessment

Patient orientation

Reporting

CRF has multiple causes

Encouraging patients to report CRF symptoms

CRF differs in its clinical expression in the individual patients

Patients rarely address symptoms of fatigue on their own accord

Information

No specific systematic information of patients about CRF

Information about CRF early after diagnoses

Online information tool

Treatability

Not treatable with a single intervention

Interdisciplinary collaboration

No treatment guidelines in the hospital

Integrative treatment program

Monitoring

Working towards self-efficacy of the patients

Attitude

Feelings of helplessness

Patient-orientation

Experiencing a life-threatening disease

Individualized approach

Self-Care options

Self-management

Infrastructure

Hospitals are short of infrastructure

Drop-in-center (coordination, monitoring)

Time-management

Doctors and patients are short of time

Prioritization of treatments

Overload of consultations and therapies

Focus on self-care

Coordination of work and treatment

Geographically reachable treatment options

Costs and affordability

Hospitals are short of manpower

Coverage by public health insurance

No coverage by public health insurance

Social welfare funds

Integrative approach

Lack of interdisciplinary collaboration

Evidence-based integrative medicine approach

Lack of coordinated integrative programs

Integrative treatment program