Skip to main content

Table 4 Classification results using the random forest classifier

From: Feasibility of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging combined with machine learning in the assessment of necrosis of osteosarcoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a preliminary study

Classification

Task

Features

Sen (%) [95% CI]

Spe (%) [95% CI]

Acc (%) [95% CI]

AUC [95% CI]

p-Value

TS vs. TN

rADC

82 [71 93]

69 [56 82]

75 [67 83]

0.83 [0.66 0.85]

0.0473

rADC, rT2WI, rST1WI

94 [87101]

78 [67 89]

85 [78 92]

0.90 [0.78 0.93]

CTS vs. TN

rADC

68 [55 81]

57 [31 83]

66 [54 78]

0.61 [0.46 0.80]

0.0153

rADC, rT2WI, rST1WI

66 [53 79]

92 [78106]

71 [60 z 82]

0.81 [0.68 0.91]

NCTS vs. TN

rADC

88 [79 97]

89 [79 99]

89 [82 96]

0.93 [0.81 0.96]

0.0933

rADC, rT2WI, rST1WI

96 [91101]

92 [83101]

94 [89 99]

0.97 [0.88 1.00]

  1. TS tumour survival, CTS cartilaginous tumour survival, NCTS non-cartilaginous tumour survival, TN tumour nonviable, Sen sensitivity, Spe specificity, Acc accuracy; the P value represents the significance of the statistical comparisons of the AUCs of the different RF models (constructed with rADC vs. constructed with rADC, rT2WI, and rST1WI)