Management and prognostic prediction of appendiceal mucinous adenocarcinoma with peritoneal metastasis: a single center study in China

Table 2 Univariate and multivariable Cox Proportional Hazards Regression Model for prognosis prediction in patients with appendiceal mucinous adenocarcinoma

Variable	Univariate hazard ratio(range)	P value	Multivariate hazard ratio(range)	P value
Age (> 60 vs. ≤ 60)	1.059 (0.545–2.056)	0.867
Gender	1.334 (0.683–2.603)	0.399
PSS	0.898 (0.663–1.216)	0.487
CA125	1.873 (0.877–4.000)	0.105
PSC	0.573 (0.249–1.319)	0.191
Ileus	0.703 (0.342–1.445)	0.338
PCI	1.836 (0.942–3.576)	0.074
CCR (0,1,2 vs.3)	6.962 (2.578–18.800)	< 0.001	9.785 (3.381–28.318)	< 0.001
HIPEC	0.758 (0.314–1.832)	0.538
Ki-67 expression (< 50% vs. ≥ 50%)	1.715 (0.856–3.438)	0.128	2.356 (1.125–4.931)	0.023
Signet ring Cell	2.073 (0.895–4.802)	0.089
Lymph node metastasis	1.874 (0.638–5.507)	0.253

PSS prior surgical score, PSC Previous systemic chemotherapy, PCI peritoneal cancer index, CCR completeness of cytoreduction, HIPEC Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy

ISSN: 1471-2407