Skip to main content

Table 2 Basic adherence rate according to the six key domains

From: A systematic review reporting quality of radiomics research in neuro-oncology: toward clinical utility and quality improvement using high-dimensional imaging features

 

Basic adherence rate

Total 16 items

37.1%

Domain 1: Protocol quality and stability in image and segmentation

32.3%

 Protocol quality

51 (100%)

 Test-retest

1 (2%)

 Phantom study

0 (0%)

 Multiple segmentation

14 (27.4%)

Domain 2: Feature selection and validation

81.4%

 Feature reduction or adjustment of multiple testing

48 (94.1%)

 Validation

35 (68.6%)

Domain 3: Biologic/clinical validation and utility

39.2%

 Multivariate analysis with non-radiomics features

32 (62.7%)

 Biologic correlates

28 (74.5%)

 Comparison to ‘gold standard’

19 (37.2%)

 Potential clinical utility

1 (2%)

Domain 4: Model performance index

45.1%

 Discrimination statistics

49 (96.1%)

 Calibration statistics

7 (13.7%)

 Cut-off analysis

13 (25.5%)

Domain 5: High level of evidence

2%

 Prospective study

2 (3.9%)

 Cost-effective analysis

0 (0%)

Domain 6: Open science and data

3 (5.9%)