Skip to main content

Table 1 Study characteristics

From: Hypofractionated radiotherapy versus conventional radiotherapy in patients with intermediate- to high-risk localized prostate cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Study

Year

Country

n

TNM or risk group

RT

Design

Schedule

ADT

Outcomes

Aluwini et al

2015–2016

Netherlands

410

T1b-T4NX-0MX-0

intermediate- to high-risk

Most IMRT

Hypofractionated versus conventional

64.6Gy (19 fractions within 6.5wks)

Yes

OS, BF

acute and late adverse events

410

78Gy (39 fractions within 8wks)

Arcangeli et al

2010–2017

Italy

83

≥T2c, Gleason ≥7

PSA ≥20ng/ml

high-risk

3D-CRT

Hypofractionated versus conventional

62Gy (20 fractions of 3.1Gy, 5wks)

Yes

OS, BF, PCaSS

acute and late adverse events

85

80Gy (40 fractions of 2Gy, 8wks)

Pollack et al

2007–2013

US

154

T1-T3, Gleason ≥5

intermediate- to high-risk

IMRT

Hypofractionated versus conventional

70.2Gy (26 fractions of 2.7Gy)

Yes

OS, BF

late adverse event

153

76Gy (38 fractions of 2Gy)

Marzi et al

2009

Italy

57

≥T2c, Gleason7-10

PSA>10ng/ml

high-risk

3D-CRT

Hypofractionated versus conventional

62Gy (20 fractions of 3.1Gy)

Yes

late adverse event

57

80Gy (40 fractions of 2Gy)

Strigary et al

2009

Italy

80

localized prostate cancer high-risk

3D-CRT

Hypofractionated versus conventional

62Gy (20 fractions of 3.1Gy)

Yes

acute adverse event

52

56Gy (16 fractions of 3.5Gy)

80Gy (40 fractions of 2Gy, 8wks)

80

Catton et al

2017

Canada

608

intermediate-risk

IMRT

Hypofractionated versus conventional

60Gy (20 fractions of 3Gy)

Yes

BF, PCaSS

acute and late adverse events

Australia

France

598

78Gy (39 fractions of 2Gy)

  1. OS Overall survival, BF Biochemical failure, ADT Androgen deprivation therapy, PCaSS Prostate cancer-specific survival, IMRT Intensity-modulated radiation therapy, 3D-CRT Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, PSA Prostate-specific antigen