Table 4 Dimensional analysis of planning and evaluation parameters according to the health administration region type. Brazil, 2017
From: Cancer care in Brazil: structure and geographical distribution
Dimensional analysis | Type of health administration region | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | Group 4 | Group 5 | Total | |
(n = 175) | (n = 47) | (n = 129) | (n = 27) | (n = 60) | (n = 438) | |
Number of geographical regions with facilities authorized for oncology services | 14 (8.0%) | 8 (17.0%) | 58 (45.0%) | 17 (62.9%) | 55 (91.7%) | 153 (34.9%) |
Number of CACON(d) or UNACON(e) facilities according to planning and evaluation parameters | ||||||
Adequate | 109 | 37 | 85 | 14 | 29 | 274 |
Higher than necessary | 2 | 1 | 19 | 3 | 15 | 40 |
Lower than necessary | 64 | 9 | 25 | 10 | 16 | 124 |
Number of paediatric oncology services(f) according to planning and evaluation parameters | ||||||
Adequate | 174 | 47 | 117 | 18 | 27 | 383 |
Higher than necessary | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 18 | 26 |
Lower than necessary | 1 | 0 | 6 | 7 | 15 | 29 |
Number of haematology-oncology services(g) according to planning and evaluation parameters | ||||||
Adequate | 173 | 47 | 108 | 16 | 21 | 365 |
Higher than necessary | 1 | 0 | 17 | 5 | 32 | 55 |
Lower than necessary | 1 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 18 |
Number of facilities according to oncology service accreditation type | ||||||
CACON(a) | 1 | 0 | 8 | 4 | 31 | 44 |
UNACON(b) | 15 | 8 | 66 | 24 | 133 | 246 |
Hospital complexes(c) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 9 |
Number of specific cancer services by type | ||||||
Clinical oncology | 16 | 8 | 73 | 28 | 148 | 273 |
Paediatric oncology | 0 | 0 | 8 | 7 | 57 | 72 |
Haematology-oncology | 1 | 0 | 24 | 12 | 86 | 123 |
Radiotherapy | 7 | 2 | 46 | 15 | 86 | 156 |
Surgical oncology | 12 | 8 | 66 | 28 | 155 | 269 |
Number of facilities authorized as CACON(a) or UNACON(b) | ||||||
1 | 14 | 8 | 48 | 13 | 21 | 104 |
2 to 5 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 5 | 28 | 45 |
> 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |