Skip to main content

Table 2 Subgroup analysis of pooled HR of OS by various factors with elevated 8-OHdG expression

From: Prognostic significance of 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine in solid tumors: a meta-analysis

Subgroup analysis

No. of studies

No. of patients

Pooled HR (95%CI)

Meta regression (p -value)

Heterogeneity

 

I2

p -value

Race

 Caucasoid

12

1129

1.962 [1.341–2.870]

0.907

66.6%

0.001

 Mongoloid

5

467

1.862 [1.117–3.104]

80.2%

< 0.001

Cancer types

 Hepatocellular carcinoma

2

156

2.853 [0.673–12.089]

0.727

84.2%

0.012

 Ovarian carcinoma

6

424

1.867 [1.190–2.930]

0.464

58.0%

0.036

 Colorectal cancer

4

330

1.637 [0.850–3.153]

0.352

71.5%

0.014

 Esophageal cancer

1

144

3.400 [2.055–5.624]

0.982

 Nonsmall-Cell Lung cancer

1

99

3.330 [1.588–6.982]

 Melanoma

1

46

1.470 [1.019–2.121]

0.367

 Breast cancer

1

145

0.100 [0.017–0.583]

0.019

 Bladder cancer

1

252

3.130 [1.298–7.548]

0.950

Detection method of 8-OHdG

 IHC

12

1157

1.787 [1.246–2.563]

0.646

74.1%

< 0.001

 ELISA

4

360

2.386 [1.167–4.881]

0.947

71.0%

0.016

 LCEC

1

79

2.510 [1.018–6.187]

 

Sample classification

 Tissue

14

1412

1.792 [1.307–2.458]

73.6%

< 0.001

 Plasma or urine

3

268

3.042 [1.676–5.519]

0.006

0.0%

0.856

Detection location of 8-OHdG

 Nuclei

10

1019

1.927 [1.321–2.810]

0.596

71.5%

< 0.001

 Cytoplasm

1

138

0.759 [0.454–1.268]

0.118

 Not mentioned

6

439

2.345 [1.429–3.848]

57.6%

0.038

research quality

 NOS score ≥ 7

5

499

1.658 [1.002–2.743]

0.526

82.7%

< 0.001

 NOS score < 7

12

1097

2.104 [1.456–3.040]

60.6%

0.003