Skip to main content

Table 2 Coding framework

From: Trained facilitators’ experiences with structured advance care planning conversations in oncology: an international focus group study within the ACTION trial

Main codes

Subcodes

Prior experiences with ACP

 

Thoughts about ACTION

 

Reasons to participate in ACTION

 

Becoming a facilitator

The RC training

Support during the study

Learning by doing

Personal and professional growth

Becoming aware of RC

Cultural issues

During the training

During the conversations

Aspects RC

Script_positive

Script_helpful questions

Script_negative

Script_difficult questions

Script_lay-out

My preferences form

Preconditions RC

Timing

Place of the conversation

Being a facilitator

Needed skills

Dual role facilitator

Be involved in the regular care

Not involved in the regular care

Out of their comfort zone

Workload

Uncertainty

Responsibility

Impressions concerning patients

Reasons for patients to participate

Investment

Preparation

Difficulties

Patients responses

The fit between RC and the patient

Personal representative

Awareness of their role

Influence on the conversation

The value of ACTION RC ACP conversations

Opportunity to reflect and talk

Empowerment of patients

Quality of life

Relationship patient-facilitator

Communication patient-PR

Patients undertake actions

Have the time to conduct an ACP conversation

Helpful

Impact on current practice

Using the intervention

Managing study and daily practice

ACP in the future

Fit RC intervention to patients

Setting

Script

Part of routine job

Risks for the future

Improvements

Implementation of the intervention

Being part of a research

The feeling of being watched by the researcher

Wanted to do it right

Patients should benefit from it

Use as an excuse to the questions they ask

  1. Abbreviations: RC Respecting Choice, ACP Advance Care Planning