Skip to main content

Table 2 Standardized incidence ratios for upper urothelial carcinomas by county and the City of Zagreb, 2001-2011

From: Geographic distribution and risk of upper urothelial carcinomas in Croatia, 2001–2011

  Observed Expected SIR (95% CI)
Brod-Posavina Countyc 86 22.1 3.90 (3.08, 4.72)b
Vukovar-Srijem Countyc 52 24.8 2.10 (1.53, 2.67)a
Dubrovnik-Neretva County 22 17.4 1.27 (0.74, 1.80)
Split-Dalmatia County 68 61.3 1.11 (0.85, 1.37)
Karlovac County 23 21.0 1.10 (0.65, 1.54)
Osijek-Baranja Countyc 45 42.0 1.07 (0.76, 1.38)
City of Zagreb 107 108.8 0.98 (0.80, 1.17)
Virovitica-Podravina Countyc 11 11.8 0.93 (0.38, 1.48)
Primorje-Gorski Kotar County 38 45.6 0.83 (0.57, 1.10)
Istria County 25 30.4 0.82 (0.50, 1.15)
Sisak-Moslavina County 22 26.8 0.82 (0.48, 1.17)
Pozega-Slavonia Countyc 9 11.1 0.81 (0.28, 1.35)
Zadar County 20 25.0 0.80 (0.45, 1.15)
Medimurje County 10 14.4 0.69 (0.26, 1.12)
Koprivnica-Krizevci County 11 16.4 0.67 (0.27, 1.07)
Lika-Senj County 6 9.30 0.64 (0.13, 1.16)
Bjelovar-Bilogora County 11 17.6 0.63 (0.26, 0.99)a
Sibenik-Knin County 10 18.4 0.54 (0.21, 0.88)a
Zagreb County 16 41.5 0.39 (0.20, 0.57)b
Varazdin County 9 23.8 0.38 (0.13, 0.62)b
Krapina-Zagorje County 7 18.6 0.38 (0.10, 0.65)b
  1. The standard population used was the 2011 Croatian Census
  2. SIR standardized incidence ratio, CI confidence interval
  3. a p < 0.05
  4. b p < 0.0001
  5. c The following Croatian counties correspond to the historical region of Slavonia
\