Skip to main content

Table 3 Univariate and Multivariate Analysis by a Cox Proportional Hazards Regression Model in Cohort

From: Prognostic value of biomarkers EpCAM and αB-crystallin associated with lymphatic metastasis in breast cancer by iTRAQ analysis

Variable

OS

Univariate

Multivariate

HR (95% CI)

P Value

HR (95% CI)

P Value

Age, years (>  45 vs. ≤ 45)

0.898 (0.581–1.390)

0.630

NA

 

ER (positive vs. negative)

1.114 (0.711–1.745)

0.637

NA

 

PR (positive vs. negative)

1.213 (0.775–1.899)

0.398

NA

 

CrebB-2 (positive vs. negative)

1.128 (0.705–1.806)

0.615

NA

 

Menstrual history (presence vs. absence)

1.381 (0.851–2.241)

0.191

NA

 

Operation

 

0.649

NA

 

 Modified radical mastectomy vs. radical correction

1.150 (0.727–1.820)

0.550

NA

 

 Other operation vs. radical correction

0.642 (0.155–2.663)

0.542

NA

 

FADD (positive vs. negative)

1.580 (0.995–2.509)

0.053

NA

 

NDRG1 (low vs. high)

1.302 (0.762–2.226)

0.335

NA

 

CRYAB (positive vs. negative)

1.561 (0.902–2.701)

0.112

NA

 

Tumor diameter, cm

 

0.072

 

NS

  > 5 vs. > 2 and ≤ 5

1.923 (1.019–3.636)

0.043

  

  > 5 vs. ≤2

2.230 (1.093–4.549)

0.027

  

TNM stage

 

< 0.0001

 

NS

 III vs. I

4.329 (1.824–10.273)

0.001

  

 III vs. II

2.101 (1.333–3.311)

0.001

  

Histology stage (poorly differentiation vs. high-middle differentiation)

2.286 (1.100–4.751)

0.027

 

NS

Histology type (lobular carcinoma vs. duct carcinoma)

1.720 (1.025–2.886)

0.040

1.846 (1.093–3.118)

0.022

Lymph node metastasis (presence vs. absence)

2.810 (1.694–4.662)

< 0.0001

2.801 (1.688–4.649)

< 0.0001

EpCAM (positive vs. negative)

2.306 (1.218–4.367)

0.010

2.585 (1.351–4.944)

0.004

  1. Data in bold are P values < 0.05