Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Study protocol of a prospective multicenter study comparing (cost-)effectiveness of a tailored interdisciplinary head and neck rehabilitation program to usual supportive care for patients treated with concomitant chemo- or bioradiotherapy

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
8 Apr 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
17 May 2018 Author responded Author comments - Ann-Jean Chavelli Carla Beck
Resubmission - Version 2
17 May 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
26 Oct 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Richard Shaw
23 Feb 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rosemary Martino
28 Feb 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Simon Rogers
4 Jun 2019 Author responded Author comments - Ann-Jean Chavelli Carla Beck
Resubmission - Version 3
4 Jun 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 3
7 Jun 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Richard Shaw
8 Jun 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Simon Rogers
17 Jun 2019 Author responded Author comments - Ann-Jean Chavelli Carla Beck
Resubmission - Version 4
17 Jun 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
24 Jun 2019 Editorially accepted
3 Jul 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12885-019-5874-z

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement