Skip to main content

Table 3 Effects of subgroups on survival rates in nasopharyngeal carcinoma underwent CV-IMRT versus RV-IMRT

From: Advantages of using reduced-volume intensity modulated radiation therapy for the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a retrospective paired study

Variate

3-year OS

3-year PFS

3-year DMFS

3-year LRRFS

CV-IMRT

RV-IMRT

P

CV-IMRT

RV-IMRT

P

CV-IMRT

RV-IMRT

P

CV-IMRT

RV-IMRT

P

Sex

Female

91.7%

95.5%

1

91.7%

95.5%

1

100.0%

95.5%

0.478

91.7%

100.0%

0.49

Male

87.9%

91.2%

0.583

81.8%

82.4%

1

89.4%

88.2%

1

90.9%

91.2%

1

Age

< 45

95.0%

90.0%

0.675

95.0%

80.0%

0.087

97.5%

85.0%

0.108

97.5%

90.0%

0.359

≥45

84.0%

94.0%

0.2

76.0%

90.0%

0.108

88.0%

94.0%

0.487

86.0%

96.0%

0.16

T stage

T1–2

86.5%

94.0%

0.319

82.7%

88.0%

0.579

90.4%

94.0%

0.716

92.3%

94.0%

1

T3–4

92.1%

90.0%

1

86.8%

82.5%

0.756

94.7%

85.0%

0.264

89.5%

92.5%

0.708

N stage

N0–1

97.4%

100.0%

1

94.7%

92.1%

1

97.4%

94.7%

1

97.4%

94.7%

1

N2–3

82.7%

86.5%

0.787

76.9%

80.8%

0.811

88.5%

86.5%

1

86.5%

92.3%

0.526

Clinical stage

I-II

100.0%

100.0%

–

95.5%

95.5%

1

95.5%

100.0%

1

100.0%

95.5%

1

III-IV

85.3%

89.7%

0.605

80.9%

82.4%

1

91.2%

86.8%

0.585

88.2%

92.6%

0.561

  1. OS overall survival, PFS progression-free survival, DMFS distant metastasis-free survival, LRRFS locoregional recurrence-free survival, CV-IMRT conventional-volume intensity-modulated radiation therapy, RV-IMRT reduced-volume intensity-modulated radiation therapy