Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison of invasive breast cancer treatment between organised and opportunistic mammography screening in women aged 50–69 years. Fribourg cancer registry 2006–2014

From: Comparison between opportunistic and organised breast cancer mammography screening in the Swiss canton of Fribourg

 

Organised screening Number (%)

Opportunistic screening Number (%)

ORa

CI95%a

P-value

Breast Surgery

 Tumorectomy

279

(85.1)

142

(78.5)

1

[0.98; 2.50]

0.060

 Mastectomy

49

(14.9)

39

(21.5)

1.6

Lymph-adenectomy

 Yes

85

(25.8)

45

(24.6)

1

[0.70; 1.62]

0.771

 No

245

(74.2)

138

(75.4)

1.0

Radiation therapy

 Yes

295

(89.4)

146

(79.8)

1

[1.29; 3.53]

0.003

 No

35

(10.6)

37

(20.2)

2.1

Hormone therapy c

 Yes

278

(84.2)

147

(80.3)

1

[0.82; 2.09]

0.261

 No

52

(15.8)

36

(19.7)

1.3

Chemotherapy

 Yes

124

(37.6)

59

(32.2)

1

[0.86; 1.85]

0.227

 No

206

(62.4)

124

(67.8)

1.3

Trastuzumabc

 Yes

26

(7.9)

17

(9.3)

1

[0.44; 1.58]

0.581

 No

304

(92.1)

166

(90.7)

0.8

Time to treatment [days]

 Mean (SDa)

12.9

(8.0)

12.0

(8.2)

  

0.214b

  1. Calculated by logistic regression (reference: organised screening);
  2. aOR Odds ratio, CI Confidence interval, SD Standard deviation;
  3. bP-value calculated by Mann-Whitney-U-Test;
  4. cTreatment begun, but not necessarily completed