Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Relative efficacy of interventions in the treatment of second-line non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
20 Dec 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
1 Apr 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lauren Averett Byers
5 May 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wei-Xiang Qi
7 Jun 2018 Author responded Author comments - Adrian David Vickers
Resubmission - Version 2
7 Jun 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
16 Oct 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lauren Averett Byers
11 Mar 2019 Author responded Author comments - Adrian David Vickers
Resubmission - Version 3
11 Mar 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 3
14 Mar 2019 Author responded Author comments - Adrian David Vickers
Resubmission - Version 4
14 Mar 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
2 Apr 2019 Editorially accepted
15 Apr 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12885-019-5569-5

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement