Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Diagnostic accuracy of 13 N-ammonia PET, 11 C-methionine PET and 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET: a comparative study in patients with suspected cerebral glioma

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
17 Nov 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
10 Dec 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alessandro Lambertini
24 Dec 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Federica Scalorbi
31 Jan 2019 Author responded Author comments - Qiao He
Resubmission - Version 2
31 Jan 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 2
17 Feb 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alessandro Lambertini
18 Feb 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Federica Scalorbi
25 Feb 2019 Author responded Author comments - Qiao He
Resubmission - Version 3
25 Feb 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 3
26 Mar 2019 Author responded Author comments - Qiao He
Resubmission - Version 4
26 Mar 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 4
28 Mar 2019 Author responded Author comments - Qiao He
Resubmission - Version 5
28 Mar 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
31 Mar 2019 Editorially accepted
8 Apr 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12885-019-5560-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement