Skip to main content

Table 5 Prognostic accuracy of the sequential use of risk scores during repeated TACE rounds to predict mortality

From: Feasibility of dynamic risk assessment for patients with repeated trans-arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma

Risk scores

Likelihood ratio (χ2)

Linear trend (χ2)

AIC

mHAP-II

22.61

24.43

1432.53

mHAP

14.67

19.67

3412.29

HAP

13.97

14.19

2296.98

  1. The model with a higher χ2 value by the likelihood ratio test and the linear trend test was considered the better model for homogeneity and discriminatory ability. Furthermore, lower values for Akaike information criteria were considered indicative of better discriminatory ability
  2. AIC Akaike information criteria, mHAP modified hepatic arterial-embolization prognostic
Back to article page

BMC Cancer

ISSN: 1471-2407

Contact us