Skip to main content

Table 5 Survival analyses

From: 18F-FDG PET/CT-based metabolic metrics in recurrent tumors of ovarian clear cell carcinoma and their prognostic implications

Univariate analysis

Variables

P (OS)

P (PRS)

 Stage at initial diagnosis (Early Vs. Late)

0.006*

0.009*

 Platinum response (Sensitive Vs. Resistant)

< 0.001*

0.051

 Type of second-line treatment (SCS + chemo Vs. Chemo)

0.012*

0.021*

 Number of relapsed lesions (Single Vs. Multiple)

0.008*

0.019*

 Peritoneal carcinomatosis (No Vs. Yes)

0.001*

< 0.001*

 SUVmax (Low Vs. High)

0.768

0.774

 MTV (Low Vs. High)

0.083

0.128

 TLG (Low Vs. High)

0.079

0.112

 MTV40 (Low Vs. High)

0.141

0.091

 TLG40 (Low Vs. High)

0.095

0.108

 MTV50 (Low Vs. High)

0.129

0.098

 TLG50 (Low Vs. High)

0.095

0.108

 MTV60 (Low Vs. High)

0.129

0.098

 TLG60 (Low Vs. High)

0.044*

0.031*

Multivariate analysis

Variables

OS

PRS

HR

95% CI

P value

HR

95% CI

P value

 Stage at initial diagnosis

1.034

0.252–4.2

0.963

2.1

0.6–7.3

0.224

 Platinum response

16.5

3.2–85.2

0.001*

/

/

/

 Type of second-line treatment

1.085

0.5–24.8

0.959

0.3

0.1–5.4

0.424

 Number of relapsed lesions

1.1

0.3–4.2

0.862

2.8

0.7–10.8

0.140

 Peritoneal carcinomatosis

12.1

2.4–61.1

0.002*

7.7

2.2–27.3

0.002*

 TLG60

4.8

1.2–18.7

0.024*

2.0

0.6–6.7

0.254

  1. †Metabolic parameters were dichotomized using the median number as cut-off value
  2. *P values with statistical significance were denoted by bold characters in underline 
  3. Abbreviations: OS Overall Survival, PRS Post-Relapse Survival, SCS Secondary cytoreduction surgery, Chemo Chemotherapy, SUVmax Maximum Standardized Uptake Value, MTV Metabolic Tumor Volume, TLG Total Lesion Glycolysis, HR Hazard Ratio, CI Confidence Interval