Skip to main content

Table 2 Results of Routine Pathologic Evaluation, Tumor Tissue Analysis und Analysis of cfDNA

From: Molecular tumor analysis and liquid biopsy: a feasibility investigation analyzing circulating tumor DNA in patients with central nervous system lymphomas

Nr.

Routine Pathologic Evaluation

Tumor Tissue – NGS Panel Analysis

cfDNA - Plasma

cfDNA – CSF

 

Histopathologic Diagnosis

Tumor cells in CSF

Number of somatic mutations a

Selected Mutation for Assay (missense)

MAF (TC)

Tumor cfDNA

MAF

Tumor cfDNA

MAF

1

Primary B-Cell Lymphoma

no

24

EP400-c.7792G > A (Chr.12)

0.32b (50%)

nod

n.a.d

nod

n.a. d

2

Primary B-Cell Lymphoma

no

1

MDM2-c.4G > A (Chr.12)

0.34b (50%)

nod

n.a. d

nod

n.a. d

3

Primary B-Cell Lymphoma

no

20

TP53-c.845G > A (Chr.17)

0.44 (90%)

yes

0.04

yes

0.49

4

Primary B-Cell Lymphoma

yes

26

BCL10-c.677G > C (Chr.1)

0.47 (90%)

yes

0.004

yes

0.47

5

Primary B-Cell Lymphoma

yes

32

ETV6-c.1196G > A (Chr.12)

0.52b,c (50%)

yes

0.02

yes

0.99 b,c

6

Unspecific Hypervascularity/No malignancy

no

0

n.a.

n.a.

n.a.

n.a.

n.a.

n.a.

  1. a2 independent somatic mutations within the same gene are counted as 2 mutations. Complex somatic aberrations on the same allele are counted as 1 mutation
  2. bLoss of wt allele
  3. cAdditional duplication of the mutated allele
  4. dIsolation of cfDNA failed in these samples, probably due to the isolation kit (see text)
  5. Nomenclature of the mutations is according to NM_015409.4 (EP400), NM_002392.5 (MDM2), NM_001126114.2 (TP53), NM_003921.4 (BCL10), NM_001987.4 (ETV6)
  6. TC tumor content (calculated based on the NAFs of various somatic mutations and single nucleotide variants both present in tumor and reference tissue)
  7. MAF mutant allele frequency = the frequency with which the mutated allele occurs in the sequencing (1 equals 100%). The observed frequencies are influenced by the tumor content and do not correlate directly with the mutation frequency in the tumor (real frequency = tumor content x MAF). The MAF is also influenced by copy number aberrations