Skip to main content

Table 2 Clinical characteristics of patients in the METABRIC cohort with Luminal A breast cancer, classified by MEDIAN DISTANCE PURITY criteria

From: Quantification of intrinsic subtype ambiguity in Luminal A breast cancer and its relationship to clinical outcomes

 

Median distance criteria

All cases

n = 674

Pure

n = 143

Neither

n = 288

Admixed

n = 243

P,

Pure vs Admixed

Age, years (mean)

62.8

58.9

63.3

64.5

<.001

Menopausal status (%)

 Pre-menopausal

19%

29%

16%

16%

< 0.001

 Post-menopausal

81%

71%

84%

84%

–

ER+ (%)

76%

79%

75%

76%

0.533

PR+ (%)

54%

52%

53%

56%

0.459

HER2+ (%)

13%

11%

14%

13%

0.525

ER+ or PR+, HER2-, and Low proliferationa

49%

65%

41%

49%

0.003

Tumor size

 mm (mean)

23.8

23.3

24.3

23.6

0.775

  < 20 mm (%)

36%

46%

34%

33%

0.012

  > 20 mm (%)

64%

54%

66%

67%

–

Grade (mean)b

 score (mean)

2.08

1.85

2.13

2.14

< 0.001

  < 3 (%)

71%

79%

67%

70%

0.057

  = 3 (%)

25%

16%

28%

26%

–

Node positive (%)

42%

38%

40%

48%

0.056

Stage (%)c

 I

44%

52%

45%

39%

0.026

 II-III-IV

56%

48%

55%

61%

–

  1. a ER, PR, and HER2 by IHC and/or FISH, proliferation determined by AURKA RNA expression
  2. b Nottingham score (0–3) based on nuclear appearance, mitotic cells and tubular architecture
  3. c Excluding missing data (12–21%)