Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of Clinicopathological Variables between ypTNM group and pTNM (n = 756) after Propensity Score-matching Using the Greedy Nearest Neighbor Algorithm without Replacement (Caliper Width 0.2 × Standard Deviation of Logit Propensity Score])

From: Different prognostic implication of ypTNM stage and pTNM stage for gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis

Characteristics

ypTNM (N = 378)

pTNM (N = 378)

P value*

Age (μ ± sd)

59.2 ± 10.5

59.3 ± 10.7

0.82

Female

97 (25.66%)

88 (23.28%)

0.45

Family history of cancer (yes)

74 (19.58%)

71 (18.78%)

0.78

BMI (μ ± sd, kg/m2)

23.5 ± 3.3

23.5 ± 3.6

0.96

ECOG

  

0.81

 0

249 (65.87%)

257 (67.99%)

 

 1

111 (29.37%)

105 (27.78%)

 

 2

18 (4.76%)

16 (4.23%)

 

Tumor location

  

0.99

 Upper

120 (31.75%)

131 (34.66%)

 

 Middle

53 (14.02%)

53 (14.02%)

 

 Low

185 (48.94%)

178 (47.09%)

 

 Whole

20 (5.29%)

16 (4.23%)

 

Short diameter (μ ± sd, in cm)

3.1 ± 2.4

3.1 ± 2.0

0.59

Long diameter (μ ± sd, in cm)

4.5 ± 3.1

4.4 ± 2.8

0.72

Pathological type

  

0.97

 Adenocarcinoma

299 (79.1%)

298 (78.84%)

 

 Signet ring cell carcinoma1

62 (16.4%)

64 (16.93%)

 

 Mucinous adenocarcinoma2

17 (4.5%)

16 (4.23%)

 

Differentiation grade

  

0.97

 Well

31 (8.2%)

30 (7.94%)

 

 Moderate

175 (46.3%)

174 (46.03%)

 

 Poor

172 (45.5%)

174 (46.03%)

 

T stage

  

0.98

 T1

35 (9.26%)

37 (9.79%)

 

 T2

65 (17.2%)

66 (17.46%)

 

 T3

59 (15.61%)

55 (14.55%)

 

 T4

219 (57.94%)

220 (58.2%)

 

N stage

  

0.99

 N0

135 (35.71%)

139 (36.77%)

 

 N1

78 (20.63%)

78 (20.63%)

 

 N2

63 (16.67%)

58 (15.34%)

 

 N3a

60 (15.87%)

61 (16.14%)

 

 N3b

42 (11.11%)

42 (11.11%)

 

TNM stage

  

0.48

 IA

25 (6.61%)

33 (8.73%)

 

 IB

42 (11.11%)

48 (12.70%)

 

 IIA

27 (7.14%)

28 (7.41%)

 

 IIB

83 (21.96%)

63 (16.67%)

 

 IIIA

63 (16.67%)

55 (14.55%)

 

 IIIB

60 (15.87%)

69 (18.25%)

 

 IIIC

78 (20.63%)

82 (21.69%)

 

Vascular cancer embolus (yes)

234 (61.9%)

239 (63.23%)

0.71

Hospital stay (μ ± sd, in days)

14.2 ± 12.3

14.2 ± 11.8

0.39

Operative time (μ ± sd, in min)

206.5 ± 58.5

208.8 ± 58.5

0.59

Blood loss (μ ± sd, in ml)

153.6 ± 120.9

153.8 ± 153.4

0.22

Gastrectomy type

  

0.76

 Laparoscopic3

24 (6.35%)

22 (5.82%)

 

 Open

354 (93.65%)

356 (94.18%)

 

Resection range

  

0.85

 Total

159 (42.06%)

165 (43.65%)

 

 Distal

167 (44.18%)

164 (43.39%)

 

 Proximal

48 (12.7%)

43 (11.38%)

 

 Thoraticabdominal joint

4 (1.06%)

6 (1.59%)

 

Multi-organ excision (yes)

19 (5.03%)

23 (6.08%)

0.53

Reconstruction approach

  

0.77

 Billroth II

76 (20.11%)

85 (22.49%)

 

 Billroth I

86 (22.75%)

73 (19.31%)

 

 Roux-en-Y

115 (30.42%)

119 (31.48%)

 

 Jejunal interposition

52 (13.76%)

55 (14.55%)

 

 Other

49 (12.96%)

46 (12.17%)

 

ASA

  

0.21

 1

57 (15.08%)

41 (10.85%)

 

 2

254 (67.2%)

270 (71.43%)

 

 3

67 (17.72%)

67 (17.72%)

 

N of lymph nodes dissected (μ ± sd)

32.4 ± 11.3

31.7 ± 12.2

0.22

N of lymph nodes metastasis (μ ± sd)

5.4 ± 8.5

5.2 ± 8.0

0.68

  1. 1include adenocarcinoma with signet ring
  2. 2include adenocarcinoma with mucinous adenocarcinoma, mucinous adenocarcinoma with signet ring
  3. 3include total laparoscopic and laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy
  4. *Mann-Whitney U test was used for all continuous variables