Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Prognostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a large institution-based cohort study from an endemic area

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
28 Dec 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
14 Jan 2018 Author responded Author comments - Ji-Jin Yao
Resubmission - Version 2
14 Jan 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
2 Jun 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rita Axelrod
15 Sep 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Reviewer 2
18 Oct 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Feng Gao
12 Nov 2018 Author responded Author comments - Ji-Jin Yao
Resubmission - Version 3
12 Nov 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
20 Nov 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Feng Gao
15 Dec 2018 Author responded Author comments - Ji-Jin Yao
Resubmission - Version 4
15 Dec 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
18 Dec 2018 Author responded Author comments - Ji-Jin Yao
Resubmission - Version 5
18 Dec 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
20 Dec 2018 Editorially accepted
8 Jan 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12885-018-5236-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement