Skip to main content

Table 2 Detection rates for participants that completed the colonoscopy using different screening protocols

From: Effects of subitems in the colorectal cancer screening protocol on the Chinese colorectal cancer screening program: an analysis based on natural community screening results

 

Colonoscopy participants

CRC

Advanced neoplasm

Adenoma

Neoplasm

number (%)

OR (95% CI)

number (%)

OR (95% CI)

number (%)

OR (95% CI)

number (%)

OR (95% CI)

Scenario A

3205

39(100.0)

1.0

181(100.0)

1.0

359(100.0)

1.0

524(100.0)

1.0

Scenario B

2439

39(100.0)

1.32(0.84–2.06)

161(89.0)

1.18(0.95–1.47)

308(85.8)

1.15(0.97–1.35)

441(84.2)

1.13(0.98–1.30)

Scenario C

3002

39(100.0)

1.07(0.68–1.67)

171(94.5)

1.01(0.81–1.25)

340(94.7)

1.01(0.87–1.19)

495(94.5)

1.01(0.88–1.16)

Scenario D

3123

39(100.0)

1.03(0.66–1.61)

180(99.4)

1.02(0.83–1.26)

358(99.8)

1.03(0.88–1.20)

517(98.7)

1.02(0.89–1.16)

Scenario E

2649

39(100.0)

1.21(0.78–1.90)

172(95.0)

1.16(0.94–1.44)

327(91.1)

1.12(0.95–1.31)

476(90.1)

1.12(0.98–1.29)

Scenario F

1430

39(100.0)

2.28(1.45–3.56)

127(70.2)

1.63(1.29–2.06)

211(58.8)

1.37(1.14–1.65)

296(56.5)

1.34(1.14–1.57)

Scenario G

2050

11(28.2)

0.44(0.22–0.86)

78(43.1)

0.66(0.50–0.87)

189(52.3)

0.81(0.67–0.97)

341(65.1)

1.02(0.88–1.19)

  1. OR = (number of cases/participants that completed the colonoscopy, scenarios B-G)/(number of cases/participants that completed the colonoscopy, scenario A)