Skip to main content

Table 2 Detection rates for participants that completed the colonoscopy using different screening protocols

From: Effects of subitems in the colorectal cancer screening protocol on the Chinese colorectal cancer screening program: an analysis based on natural community screening results

  Colonoscopy participants CRC Advanced neoplasm Adenoma Neoplasm
number (%) OR (95% CI) number (%) OR (95% CI) number (%) OR (95% CI) number (%) OR (95% CI)
Scenario A 3205 39(100.0) 1.0 181(100.0) 1.0 359(100.0) 1.0 524(100.0) 1.0
Scenario B 2439 39(100.0) 1.32(0.84–2.06) 161(89.0) 1.18(0.95–1.47) 308(85.8) 1.15(0.97–1.35) 441(84.2) 1.13(0.98–1.30)
Scenario C 3002 39(100.0) 1.07(0.68–1.67) 171(94.5) 1.01(0.81–1.25) 340(94.7) 1.01(0.87–1.19) 495(94.5) 1.01(0.88–1.16)
Scenario D 3123 39(100.0) 1.03(0.66–1.61) 180(99.4) 1.02(0.83–1.26) 358(99.8) 1.03(0.88–1.20) 517(98.7) 1.02(0.89–1.16)
Scenario E 2649 39(100.0) 1.21(0.78–1.90) 172(95.0) 1.16(0.94–1.44) 327(91.1) 1.12(0.95–1.31) 476(90.1) 1.12(0.98–1.29)
Scenario F 1430 39(100.0) 2.28(1.45–3.56) 127(70.2) 1.63(1.29–2.06) 211(58.8) 1.37(1.14–1.65) 296(56.5) 1.34(1.14–1.57)
Scenario G 2050 11(28.2) 0.44(0.22–0.86) 78(43.1) 0.66(0.50–0.87) 189(52.3) 0.81(0.67–0.97) 341(65.1) 1.02(0.88–1.19)
  1. OR = (number of cases/participants that completed the colonoscopy, scenarios B-G)/(number of cases/participants that completed the colonoscopy, scenario A)
\