Skip to main content

Table 3 Progression-free survival – naïve and MAIC (base-case and sensitivity) analyses

From: Axitinib, cabozantinib, or everolimus in the treatment of prior sunitinib-treated patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: results of matching-adjusted indirect comparison analyses

 

Naïve

Base-case analysis

Sensitivity analysis

Axitinib (AXIS) vs. cabozantinib (METEOR)

 Axitinib, median (95% CI) PFS, months

4.8 (4.5–6.5)

6.5 (4.7–10.4)

4.8 (4.2–6.7)

 Cabozantinib, median (95% CI) PFS, months

9.1 (6.4–9.4)

9.1 (6.4–9.4)

9.1 (6.4–9.4)

 aHR (95% CI)

–

1.15 (0.82–1.63)

1.39 (1.00–1.92)

Axitinib (AXIS) vs. everolimus (METEOR)

 Axitinib, median (95% CI) PFS, months

4.8 (4.5–6.5)

6.5 (4.7–11.0)

6.5 (4.6–7.8)

 Everolimus, median (95% CI) PFS, months

3.7 (3.5–4.4)

3.7 (3.5–4.4)

3.7 (3.5–4.4)

 aHR (95% CI)

–

0.53 (0.36–0.80)

0.63 (0.45–0.88)

  1. aHR adjusted hazard ratio, CI confidence interval, MAIC matching-adjusted indirect comparison, MSKCC Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, PFS progression-free survival