Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Systematic review of quality of life following pleurectomy decortication and extrapleural pneumonectomy for malignant pleural mesothelioma

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
23 May 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
23 Jul 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David A. Waller
31 Jul 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Filippo Lococo
1 Aug 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Fergus Macbeth
22 Aug 2018 Author responded Author comments - Rebecca Schwartz
Resubmission - Version 2
22 Aug 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
24 Aug 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Filippo Lococo
9 Sep 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David A. Waller
10 Sep 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Fergus Macbeth
5 Oct 2018 Author responded Author comments - Rebecca Schwartz
Resubmission - Version 3
5 Oct 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
11 Oct 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Fergus Macbeth
24 Oct 2018 Author responded Author comments - Rebecca Schwartz
Resubmission - Version 4
24 Oct 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
28 Oct 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Fergus Macbeth
7 Nov 2018 Author responded Author comments - Rebecca Schwartz
Resubmission - Version 5
7 Nov 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
7 Nov 2018 Editorially accepted
29 Nov 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12885-018-5064-4

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement