Skip to main content

Table 3 The relationship between CTCs enumeration and TNM stage of NPC patients

From: Circulating tumor cells with karyotyping as a novel biomarker for diagnosis and treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma

 

Newly diagnosis (M0, N = 29)

Relapse/Distant metastasis after treatment (N = 21)

Stagea

Nb

No. of CTCs

Nb

No. of CTCs

Range

Mean ± SD

Range

Mean ± SD

Total

29

0–24

3.7 ± 4.6

21

0–45

8.6 ± 13.3

T-classification

 T1

5

1–3

2.0 ± 1.0

2

1–4

2.5 ± 2.1

 T2

5

0–13

3.8 ± 5.3

3

1–8

3.3 ± 4.0

 T3

7

0–7

3.0 ± 2.2

6

0–22

3.0 ± 3.0

 T4

12

1–24

4.8 ± 6.2

10

0–45

12.1 ± 17.9

N-classification

 N0

3

0–5

3.0 ± 2.6

1

16

16.0

 N1

1

1

1.0

7

1–45

16.4 ± 19.8

 N2

20

0–24

4.4 ± 5.4

9

0–8

2.6 ± 2.6

 N3

5

1–3

2.0 ± 0.7

4

1–22

6.8 ± 10.1

TNM stage

 I

0

–

–

0

–

–

 II

2

0–1

0.5 ± 0.7

2

1–4

2.5 ± 2.1

 III

12

0–13

3.7 ± 3.4

7

0–12

8.6 ± 13.3

 IV

15

1–24

4.1 ± 5.7

12

0–45

12.0 ± 16.8

  1. Detectable CTCs were existence in 27 newly diagnosed (M0) patients and 19
  2. relapsed/distant metastatic patients. Data were presented as mean ± standard deviation
  3. a Stage for patients with relapse/distant metastasis after treatment refered to TNM stage at NPC initial diagnosis
  4. b N referred to number of patients