Skip to main content

Table 4 Power of FAM19A4 methylation, cytology and HPV16/18 genotyping for detection HSIL alone and ≥ HSIL

From: The clinical significance of FAM19A4 methylation in high-risk HPV-positive cervical samples for the detection of cervical (pre)cancer in Chinese women

Triage

Endpoint

AUC (95%CI)

Sensitivity (%(95%CI))

Specificity (%(95%CI))

YI (%)

FAM19A4

HSIL alone

0.67(0.58–0.76)

56.14(43.26–69.02)

81.44 (73.71–89.18)

37.58

≥HSIL

0.81(0.75–0.87)

75.42(67.66–83.19)

81.44 (73.71–89.18)

56.86

Cytology

HSIL alone

0.69(0.61–0.78)

78.95(68.36–89.53)a

59.79(50.04–69.55) c

38.74

≥HSIL

0.71(0.64–0.79)

83.05(76.28–89.82) **

59.79(50.04–69.55)d

42.84

HPV16/18 genotyping

HSIL alone

0.58(0.49–0.68) *

49.12(36.14–62.10) **

67.0(57.65–76.37) c

16.13

≥HSIL

0.66(0.59–0.74)

65.25(56.66–73.85) **

67.01(57.65–76.37)d

32.26

FAM19A4 and HPV16/18

HSIL alone

0.67(0.58–0.76)

73.68(62.25–85.12) a

59.79(50.04–69.55) c

33.48

≥HSIL

0.73(0.66–0.80)

86.44(80.26–92.62)b

59.79(50.04–69.55) d

46.23

  1. AUC area under curve, YI youden index
  2. *P>0.05
  3. **compared with the sensitivity of FAM19A4 in group of HSIL alone or ≥ HSIL, P>0.05
  4. a: compared with the sensitivity of FAM19A4 in group of HSIL alone, P < 0.05
  5. b: compared with the sensitivity of FAM19A4 in group of ≥HSIL, P<0.05
  6. c: compared with the specificity of FAM19A4 in group of HSIL alone,P<0.05
  7. d: compared with the specificity of FAM19A4 in group of ≥HSIL,P<0.05