Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Age-related sarcoma patient experience: results from a national survey in England

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
24 Aug 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
19 Sep 2017 Author responded Author comments - Eugenie Younger
Resubmission - Version 2
19 Sep 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
24 Oct 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kevin Charles Oeffinger
3 Apr 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Bhaskar Rao
30 Apr 2018 Author responded Author comments - Eugenie Younger
Resubmission - Version 3
30 Apr 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
12 Jun 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Bhaskar Rao
18 Jul 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Reviewer 2
25 Jul 2018 Author responded Author comments - Eugenie Younger
Resubmission - Version 4
25 Jul 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
13 Aug 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Reviewer 2
24 Sep 2018 Author responded Author comments - Eugenie Younger
Resubmission - Version 5
24 Sep 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
26 Sep 2018 Editorially accepted
17 Oct 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12885-018-4866-8

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement