Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Addition of triple negativity of breast cancer as an indicator for germline mutations in predisposing genes increases sensitivity of clinical selection criteria

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
20 Oct 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
8 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Juliane Hoyer
Resubmission - Version 2
8 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
20 Dec 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Suzette Delaloge
2 Jan 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rachel Ellsworth
19 Mar 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gulsah Cecener
30 Apr 2018 Author responded Author comments - Juliane Hoyer
Resubmission - Version 3
30 Apr 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
3 May 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rachel Ellsworth
16 Jul 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Reviewer 2
9 Aug 2018 Author responded Author comments - Juliane Hoyer
Resubmission - Version 4
9 Aug 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
18 Aug 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Reviewer 2
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
14 Sep 2018 Editorially accepted
26 Sep 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12885-018-4821-8

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement