Tumor necrosis as a prognostic variable for the clinical outcome in patients with renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|2 Apr 2018||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|9 May 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alejandro Sanchez|
|15 May 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Brian Winters|
|31 May 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Lijin Zhang|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|31 May 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|6 Jul 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Brian Winters|
|29 Jul 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alejandro Sanchez|
|20 Aug 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Lijin Zhang|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|20 Aug 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|23 Aug 2018||Editorially accepted|
|3 Sep 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12885-018-4773-z|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.