Skip to main content

Table 3 Multivariate model predicting total fertility-related distress

From: Determinants of fertility issues experienced by young women diagnosed with breast or gynaecological cancer – a quantitative, cross-cultural study

 

B

SE B

β

p

Step 1 – control variables

 Constant

25.49

10.37

 

≤0.05

 Age at diagnosis

−0.45

0.25

−0.14

n.s.

 Country of origin (Britain vs Poland)

12.45

3.67

0.24

< 0.01

 Type of cancer (gynaecological vs breast)

3.14

5.01

0.059

n.s.

 Type of treatment (sterile vs uncertain fertility)

−9.62

4.16

− 0.22

≤0.05

 Recruitment site (other vs online)

−10.42

3.20

−0.24

< 0.01

 Childbearing status (no vs yes)

−3.24

2.90

−0.075

n.s.

 Negative affect

1.06

0.153

0.461

< 0.01

Step 2 – desire to have children

 Constant

3.61

11.71

 

n.s.

 Age at diagnosis

−0.17

0.25

−0.053

n.s.

 Country of origin (Britain vs Poland)

13.28

3.53

0.271

< 0.01

 Type of cancer (gynaecological vs breast)

2.32

4.82

0.044

n.s.

 Type of treatment (sterile vs uncertain fertility)

−8.18

4.01

−0.184

≤0.05

 Recruitment site (other vs online)

−9.27

3.09

−0.214

≤0.05

 Childbearing status (no vs yes)

−0.48

2.89

−0.011

n.s.

 Negative affect

1.06

0.15

0.46

< 0.01

 Desire to have children

3.43

0.97

0.25

< 0.01

Step 3 – treatment-related regret

 Constant

−0.41

11.49

 

n.s.

 Age at diagnosis

−0.14

0.24

−0.04

n.s.

 Country of origin (Britain vs Poland)

13.82

3.44

0.28

< 0.01

 Type of cancer (gynaecological vs breast)

1.45

4.70

0.03

n.s.

 Type of treatment (sterile vs uncertain fertility)

−5.76

4.00

−0.13

n.s.

 Recruitment site (other vs online)

−8.18

3.03

−0.19

≤0.05

 Childbearing status (no vs yes)

0.63

2.84

0.02

n.s.

 Negative affect

1.03

0.14

0.45

< 0.01

 Desire to have children

2.97

0.96

0.22

< 0.01

 Treatment related regret (no vs all others)

8.65

3.00

0.19

≤0.05

Step 4 – culture-related variables

 Constant

−6.25

11.80

 

n.s.

 Age at diagnosis

−0.22

0.25

−0.07

n.s.

 Country of origin (Britain vs Poland)

12.21

3.67

0.25

< 0.01

 Type of cancer (gynaecological vs breast)

2.21

4.71

0.04

n.s.

 Type of treatment (sterile vs uncertain fertility)

−7.26

4.07

−0.16

n.s.

 Recruitment site (other vs online)

−8.31

3.05

−0.19

≤0.05

 Childbearing status (no vs yes)

−0.80

3.07

−0.02

n.s.

 Negative affect

0.94

0.15

0.41

< 0.01

 Desire to have children

2.30

1.02

0.17

≤0.05

 Treatment related regret (no vs all others)

8.27

3.05

0.18

≤0.05

 Cultural disapproval of childlessness (no vs all others)

3.85

2.74

0.09

n.s.

 VOC_U

1.50

2.66

0.05

n.s.

 VOC_S

−0.99

3.01

−0.03

n.s.

 VOC_P

3.28

2.26

0.12

n.s.

Step 5 – illness perceptions

 Constant

−11.68

11.54

 

n.s.

 Age at diagnosis

−0.27

0.24

−0.08

n.s.

 Country of origin (Britain vs Poland)

11.58

3.55

0.24

< 0.01

 Type of cancer (gynaecological vs breast)

−0.17

4.61

−0.01

n.s.

 Type of treatment (sterile vs uncertain fertility)

−5.49

3.98

−0.12

n.s.

 Recruitment site (other vs online)

−6.41

3.01

−0.15

≤0.05

 Childbearing status (no vs yes)

−2.31

3.01

−0.05

n.s.

 Negative affect

0.70

0.16

0.31

< 0.01

 Desire to have children

2.03

0.99

0.15

≤0.05

 Treatment related regret (no vs all others)

7.27

2.97

0.16

≤0.05

 Cultural disapproval of childlessness (no vs all others)

2.94

2.66

0.07

n.s.

 VOC_U

1.28

2.57

0.05

n.s.

 VOC_S

−1.70

2.92

−0.06

n.s.

 VOC_P

4.10

2.20

0.15

n.s.

 Brief-IPQ total

0.35

0.11

0.23

< 0.01

  1. Step 1: R2 = 0.466, adjusted R2 = 0.438, F(7, 134) = 16.69, p < 0.01
  2. Step 2: R2 = 0.512, adjusted R2 = 0.482, F(1, 133) = 12.55, p < 0.01, Δ R2 = 0.046
  3. Step 3: R2 = 0.541, adjusted R2 = 0.509, F(1, 132) = 8.31, p < 0.01, Δ R2 = 0.029
  4. Step 4: R2 = 0.561, adjusted R2 = 0.516, F(4, 128) = 1.48, p = n.s., Δ R2 = 0.020
  5. Step 5: R2 = 0.593, adjusted R2 = 0.548, F(1, 127) = 9.99, p < 0.01, Δ R2 = 0.032