Skip to main content

Table 2 Univariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis for overall survival and relapse-free survival in gastric carcinoma patients

From: Expression of oxidized protein tyrosine phosphatase and γH2AX predicts poor survival of gastric carcinoma patients

Characteristics

No.

OS

P

RFS

P

HR (95% CI)

HR (95% CI)

Age, y, ≥ 60 (vs < 60)

117/169

1.254 (0.802–1.963)

0.321

1.280 (0.819–2.001)

0.278

Sex, male (vs female)

128/169

0.956 (0.597–1.529)

0.851

0.978 (0.612–1.563)

0.926

CEA, elevated (vs normal)

31/141

1.802 (1.100–2.952)

0.019

1.783 (1.090–2.918)

0.021

CA19–9, elevated (vs normal)

16/140

2.055 (1.109–3.809)

0.022

1.946 (1.051–3.604)

0.034

TNM stage

 I

34/169

1

<  0.001

1

<  0.001

 II

44/169

2.154 (0.932–4.976)

0.073

2.146 (0.929–4.958)

0.074

 III

64/169

5.773 (2.694–12.370)

<  0.001

6.070 (2.834–13.001)

<  0.001

 IV

27/169

8.753 (3.840–19.953)

<  0.001

8.846 (3.884–20.147)

<  0.001

Venous invasion, presence (vs absence)

30/169

3.360 (2.108–5.357)

<  0.001

3.336 (2.094–5.314)

<  0.001

Tumor invasion, AGC (vs EGC)

133/169

3.510 (1.811–6.803)

<  0.001

3.592 (1.853–6.960)

<  0.001

Histologic grade

 WD

10/117

1

0.104

1

0.118

 MD

64/117

2.456 (0.756–7.978)

0.135

2.444 (0.752–7.941)

0.137

 PD

43/117

3.325 (1.011–10.936)

0.048

3.248 (0.987–10.683)

0.053

Ox-PTP nucleus, positive (vs negative)

115/169

5.799 (3.084–10.905)

<  0.001

5.954 (3.167–11.192)

<  0.001

Ox-PTP cytoplasm, positive (vs negative)

82/169

1.863 (1.238–2.803)

0.003

1.982 (1.319–2.978)

<  0.001

ɣH2AX, positive (vs negative)

97/169

2.774 (1.768–4.352)

<  0.001

2.607 (1.671–4.066)

<  0.001

  1. Abbreviations: OS overall survival, RFS relapse-free survival, HR hazard ratio, CEA carcinoembryonic antigen, CA19–9 carbohydrate antigen 19–9, LN lymph node, EGC early gastric cancer, AGC advanced gastric cancer