Skip to main content

Table 4 A brief comparisons of performance of various existing method and the proposed algorithm

From: Removal of pectoral muscle based on topographic map and shape-shifting silhouette

Method

[18]

Hough

[18]

Gabour

[64]

Shape based

Proposed

(MIAS)

Proposed

(CEDM)

FP mean

0.58

1.98

1.02

0.99

0.98

FN mean

5.77

25.19

5.63

5.67

5.66

FP < 5%

FN < 5%

53.57%

11.90

58.33

57.30

57.25

Min (FP, FN) < 5%

5 %  <  Max  (FP, FN) < 10%

0.0

0.0

35.71

36.50

35.90

Min (FP, FN) < 5%

Max (FP, FN) > 10%

0.0

0.0

4.74

3.50

3.48

5 %  < FP < 10

5 %  < FN < 10%

26.19%

9.52

0.0

0.0

0.0

5 %  <  Min  (FP, FN) < 10%

Max (FP, FN) > 10%

0.0

0.0

1.12

1.12

1.15

FP > 10%

FN > 10%

20.24

78.57

0.0

0.0

0.0

Hausdorff Distance (HD)

3.84 ± 1.73

7.08 ± 5.26

3.53 ± 1.61

3.52 ± 1.59

3.51 ± 1.58