Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of characteristics before and after propensity score matching

From: Efficacy after preoperative capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX) versus docetaxel, oxaliplatin and S1 (DOS) in patients with locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis

Variables

Before matching

After matching

XELOX group

(n = 172)

DOS group

(n = 89)

P

XELOX group

(n = 159)

DOS group

(n = 89)

P

Gender

  

0.130

  

0.224

 Male

131 (76.1)

60 (67.4)

 

120 (75.5)

60 (67.4)

 

 Female

41 (23.9)

29 (32.6)

 

39 (24.5)

29 (32.6)

 

Age (median year, range)

  

0.152

  

0.214

 Median

62

59

 

62

59

 

 Range

31–78

24–74

 

31–78

24–74

 

 60

101 (58.7)

44 (49.4)

 

93 (58.5)

44(51.2)

 

Location

  

0.857

  

0.966

 Gastroesophageal junction

56 (32.5)

28 (31.5)

 

51 (32.1)

28 (31.5)

 

 Stomach

116 (67.5)

61 (68.5)

 

108 (67.9)

61 (68.5)

 

Lauren type

  

0.043

  

0.167

 Intestinal type

96 (55.8)

42 (47.2)

 

89 (55.9)

42 (47.2)

 

 Diffuse type

48 (27.9)

38 (44.7)

 

49 (29.0)

38 (44.7)

 

 Mixed type

28 (16.3)

9 (8.1)

 

21 (15.1)

9 (8.1)

 

CEA

  

0.055

  

0.197

 Normal

133 (77.3)

59 (66.3)

 

119 (74.8)

59 (66.3)

 

 Elevated

39 (22.7)

30 (33.7)

 

40 (25.2)

30 (33.7)

 

Causes of unresection

  

0.493

  

0.454

 T4b

11 (6.4)

7 (7.8)

 

10 (6.3)

7 (7.8)

 

 Borrmanntype 4 or large type 3

57 (33.1)

35 (39.3)

 

52 (32.7)

35 (39.3)

 

 Bulky lymph nodes

104 (60.5)

47 (52.9)

 

97 (64.0)

47 (52.9)

 

Clinical T stage

  

0.579

  

0.535

 cT3

9 (5.2)

7 (7.9)

 

8 (5.0)

7 (7.9)

 

 cT4

163 (94.8)

82 (92.1)

 

151 (95.0)

82 (92.1)

 

Clinical N stage

  

0.485

  

0.459

 cN1

56 (32.6)

32 (36.0)

 

52 (32.7)

32 (36.0)

 

 cN2

73 (42.4)

31 (34.8)

 

68 (42.8)

31 (34.8)

 

 cN3

43 (25.0)

26 (29.2)

 

39 (24.5)

26 (29.2)