Study | Treatment line | Design | Com-parator | Participants | Activating EGFR mutation | Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jackman et al. (2007) [28] | First line | Open-label, phase 2 | None | N = 80; 95% Caucasian | 9/43 patients tested | • Median OS: 10.9 months (95% CI 7.8–14.6) • 1-year survival rate 46% • Well tolerated: most common AEs were rash (79%) and diarrhea (69%) |
Chen et al. (2012) [27] | First line | Open-label, randomized, phase 2 | Vino-relbine (V) | N = 113; 57 (E) vs. 56 (V); 100% Taiwanese | 24/60 patients tested | • Median OS: 17.3 months (E) vs. 22.6 months (V) • Mild toxicities: most frequent treatment-related AEs were rash (64.91%), diarrhea (29.82%), and mouth ulceration (14.04%) |
TRUST elderly subgroup [29] | First line | Open-label, phase 4 (subgroup analysis) | None | N = 485; 82% Caucasian; 16% Asian | 2/18 patients tested | • Median OS: 7.29 months (95% CI 6.27–8.67), non-Asian population: 7.19 months • 1-year survival rate: 36.6% • Disease control rate 79% (compared with 69% for the overall population; p < 0.0001) • Good tolerability: only 4% had grade ≥ 3 treatment-related AEs, 7% had treatment-related SAEs (compared with 4% of the overall population) |
Stinchcombe et al. (2011) [30] | Any | Open-label, randomized, phase 2 | Gem, E + Gem | N = 146; 51 (E) vs. 44 (gem) vs. 51 E/gem; US study (included ethnicities not reported) | Unknown | • Median OS with E: 5.8 months (95% CI 3.0–8.3) • Acneiform rash with E: 45% • No significant difference in 6-month PFS, OS and toxicity rates among the groups |
POLARSTAR [31] | Any | Open-label,phase 4 | None | N = 9907a; Age-stratified: 7848 (< 75 years), 1911 (75–84 years), 148 (≥85 years); 100% Japanese | Unknown | • Efficacy and incidence of non-hematologic and hematologic toxicities were comparable between age groups |
BR.21 Study elderly subgroup [20] | ≥Second line | Double-blind, randomized, phase 3 (retrospective subgroup analysis) | Placebo | Erlotinib: 112 (elderly) vs. 376 (young); 9.2% Asian, 90.8% other | 15/115 patients tested | • Median OS (elderly vs. young): 7.6 months (elderly) vs. 6.4 months (young); HR 1.02 (95% CI 0.81–1.30) • More overall and severe (grade 3–4) toxicity with erlotinib in elderly vs. younger patients (35% vs 18%; p < 0.001) |
Keio Lung Oncology Group Study 001 [33] | ≥Second line | Phase 2 | None | N = 38; 100% Japanese | 13/35 tested | • Median OS: 17.3 months (95% CI 13.3–21.3) • Main AE was skin rash (76%) |
Lung Oncology Group in Kyushu (LOGiK-0802) [32] | ≥Second line | Phase 2 | None | N = 40b; 100% Japanese | 10/29 tested | • Median OS: 12.2 months (95% CI 6,1–24,7) • Major toxicities: skin disorders, fatigue, anorexia • 32.5% required dose reduction |
ElderTac (present study) | ≥Second line | Prospective, non-interventional | None | N = 465c; 99.2% Caucasian | 18/119 patients tested | • Median OS: 7.1 months • 1-year survival rate: 30.6% • No new safety signals; most frequently reported AEs were rash (45.2%) and diarrhea (22.6%) |