Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of the clinical characteristics of patients with different dNLR-PNI grade

From: A novel combined systemic inflammation-based score can predict survival of intermediate-to-advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients undergoing transarterial chemoembolization

Variable

dNLR-PNI 0

dNLR-PNI 1

dNLR-PNI 2

P value

(n = 149)

(n = 296)

(n = 316)

Age (y)

55.8 ± 12.9

54.0 ± 14.0

56.0 ± 13.1

0.15

Gender (male/ female)

131/ 18

252/ 44

259/ 57

0.304

BMI (Kg/m2)

22.9 ± 3.1

22.6 ± 3.3

22.3 ± 2.9

0.271

HBsAg (positive/ negative)

133/ 16

242/ 54

275/ 41

0.061

ALT (IU/L)

57.6 ± 49.9

60.9 ± 64.5

57.9 ± 50.8

0.758

AST (IU/L)

58.1 ± 43.1

72.5 ± 64.4

91.3 ± 76.3

< 0.001b

TBIL (μmol/L)

18.0 ± 13.3

19.3 ± 11.7

24.7 ± 33.6

0.003a

ALB (g/L)

43.1 ± 5.4

40.2 ± 6.1

35.3 ± 4.4

< 0.001b

PT (s)

11.9 ± 1.41

12.4 ± 1.9

12.9 ± 1.6

< 0.001b

INR

1.1 ± 0.1

1.1 ± 0.1

1.1 ± 0.1

0.175

Creatinine (μmol/L)

78.5 ± 15.6

79.9 ± 65.5

73.5 ± 20.4

0.168

Child-pugh grade (A/ B)

145/ 4

257/ 39

220/ 96

< 0.001b

MELD score

5.6 ± 4.3

5.8 ± 5.0

6.3 ± 3.9

0.245

AFP (μg/L), ≤ 400/ > 400

92/ 57

176/ 120

182/ 134

0.69

Largest tumor size (cm)

6.3 ± 3.6

7.4 ± 3.8

9.2 ± 4.7

< 0.001b

Tumor number (single/multiple)

61/ 88

119/ 177

133/ 183

0.93

Vascular invasion (absent/ present)

96/ 53

145/ 151

126/ 190

< 0.001b

TACE treatments (1/ 2/ > 2)

60/ 38/ 51

128/ 76/ 92

165/ 81/ 70

0.026a

  1. dNLR derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, PNI prognostic nutritional index, WBC white blood cells, BMI body mass index, ALT alanine transaminase, AST aspartate transaminase, ALB albumin, PT Prothrombin time, INR international normalized ratio, HBsAg hepatitis B surface antigen, AFP α-fetoprotein, TBIl total bilirubin, MELD the model for end stage liver disease
  2. aP < 0.05, when dNLR-PNI 2 vs. dNLR-PNI 0 and dNLR-PNI 1
  3. bP < 0.05 when each group compared with each other