This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
A randomised trial to compare cognitive outcome after gamma knife radiosurgery versus whole brain radiation therapy in patients with multiple brain metastases: research protocol CAR-study B
© The Author(s). 2018
Received: 31 July 2017
Accepted: 8 February 2018
Published: 21 February 2018
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|31 Jul 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|15 Aug 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Wietske Schimmel|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|15 Aug 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|25 Sep 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Wenyin Shi|
|6 Dec 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Veronica L.S Chiang|
|17 Jan 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Wietske Schimmel|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|17 Jan 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|7 Feb 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Wenyin Shi|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|8 Feb 2018||Editorially accepted|
|21 Feb 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12885-018-4106-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.