Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comprehensive evaluation of NT5E/CD73 expression and its prognostic significance in distinct types of cancers

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
21 Feb 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
28 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Roberto Passera
19 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elisabetta Ferretti
25 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eva Fischer-Fodor
25 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Aditya Dutta
4 May 2017 Author responded Author comments - Tao Jiang
Resubmission - Version 2
4 May 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
9 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Roberto Passera
9 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eva Fischer-Fodor
23 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Aditya Dutta
28 Sep 2017 Author responded Author comments - Tao Jiang
Resubmission - Version 3
28 Sep 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
13 Jan 2018 Author responded Author comments - Tao Jiang
Resubmission - Version 4
13 Jan 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
22 Jan 2018 Author responded Author comments - Tao Jiang
Resubmission - Version 5
22 Jan 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
29 Jan 2018 Editorially accepted
7 Mar 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12885-018-4073-7

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement