Skip to main content

Table 2 Prevalence and prevalence ratio from 2006 to 2013, comparing the quality indicators using the South as a reference

From: Trend analysis of the quality indicators for the Brazilian cervical cancer screening programme by region and state from 2006 to 2013

Macro-region

 

Productivity ratea

 

Unsatisfactory exams

 

Positivity index

 

ASC-US

 

HSIL

 

P (%)

PR

P (%)

PR

P (%)

PR

P (%)

PR

P (%)

PR

South

17.08

1.0 (ref)

0.41

1.0 (ref)

1.91

1.0 (ref)

0.90

1.0 (ref)

0.26

1.0 (ref)

Southeast

16.42

0.96

0.65

1.59

2.98

1.56

1.53

1.70

0.28

1.08

Midwest

15.64

0.92

0.97

2.37

3.12

1.64

1.26

1.39

0.45

1.72

Northeast

17.02

0.99

1.89

4.60

2.17

1.14

0.80

0.88

0.29

1.12

North

14.13

0.83

1.64

3.98

2.60

1.37

0.92

1.02

0.43

1.67

  1. Abbreviations: ASC-US Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance, HSIL High-grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion, P prevalence, PR prevalence ratio, ref. reference value
  2. aOnly data until 2012 were available,