Skip to main content

Table 2 Relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) between selected risk factors and risk of colorectal cancer

From: Attributable causes of colorectal cancer in China

Risk factors

RR (95% CI)

Sources

Men

Women

Design

Smoking

1.16 (1.09–1.24)

1.16 (1.09–1.24)

Meta-analysis

30

Alcohol drinking

1.24 (1.01–1.54)

1.24 (1.01–1.54)

Cohort study

31

Overweight

1.25 (1.07–1.45)

1.25 (1.07–1.45)

Cohort study

32

Obesity

1.57 (1.23–2.00)

1.57 (1.23–2.00)

  

Physical inactivity

1.32 (1.23–1.41)

1.27 (1.17–1.41)

Meta-analysis

33

Vegetable intakea: Urban

   

12

Quintile 5

1.00

1.00

 

Quintile 4

1.12 (1.04–1.19)

1.10 (1.03–1.16)

 

Quintile 3

1.20 (1.06–1.34)

1.18 (1.05–1.30)

 

Quintile 2

1.30 (1.09–1.51)

1.27 (1.08–1.46)

 

Quintile 1

1.52 (1.14–1.95)

1.46 (1.13–1.83)

 

Vegetable intakea: rural

  

Meta-analysis

12

Quintile 5

1.00

1.00

 

Quintile 4

1.12 (1.04–1.19)

1.10 (1.03–1.16)

 

Quintile 3

1.21 (1.06–1.35)

1.19 (1.06–1.31)

 

Quintile 2

1.30 (1.09–1.52)

1.27 (1.08–1.46)

 

Quintile 1

1.50 (1.14–1.92)

1.46 (1.13–1.83)

 

Fruit intakea: urban

  

Meta-analysis

12

Quintile 5

1.00

1.00

 

Quintile 4

1.04 (1.01–1.07)

1.05 (1.02–1.09)

 

Quintile 3

1.06 (1.02–1.11)

1.07 (1.02–1.13)

 

Quintile 2

1.09 (1.03–1.15)

1.10 (1.03–1.17)

 

Quintile 1

1.12 (1.04–1.21)

1.13 (1.04–1.23)

 

Fruit intakea: rural

  

Meta-analysis

12

Quintile 5

1.00

1.00

 

Quintile 4

1.06 (1.02–1.10)

1.09 (1.03–1.15)

 

Quintile 3

1.07 (1.02–1.12)

1.11 (1.03–1.19)

 

Quintile 2

1.09 (1.03–1.16)

1.13 (1.04–1.23)

 

Quintile 1

1.12 (1.04–1.20)

1.16 (1.05–1.28)

 

Red and processed meata: urban

  

Meta-analysis

11

Quintile 1

1.00

1.00

 

Quintile 2

1.07 (1.02–1.11)

1.04 (1.01–1.07)

 

Quintile 3

1.12 (1.03–1.20)

1.09 (1.03–1.15)

 

Quintile 4

1.17 (1.05–1.29)

1.14 (1.04–1.24)

 

Quintile 5

1.27 (1.07–1.48)

1.22 (1.06–1.38)

 

Red and processed meata: rural

  

Meta-analysis

11

Quintile 1

1.00

1.00

 

Quintile 2

1.04 (1.01–1.07)

1.04 (1.01–1.07)

 

Quintile 3

1.08 (1.02–1.14)

1.07 (1.02–1.11)

 

Quintile 4

1.12 (1.03–1.21)

1.12 (1.03–1.20)

 

Quintile 5

1.20 (1.06–1.34)

1.17 (1.05–1.29)

 
  1. aRRs were first transformed onto a log scale and divided by 100 to give the log RR/g per day, then multiplied by the lower intake in each quintile, finally, the RRs in other quintiles were divided by that in quintile 5 (vegetable and fruit) or quintile 1 (red and processed meat) to get the final RRs, and the RR in quintile 5 (vegetable and fruit) or quintile 1 (red and processed meat) was assumed to be equal to 1