This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Risk of second primary cancers in cancer patients treated with cisplatin: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized studies
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 31 December 2016
Accepted: 8 December 2017
Published: 19 December 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|31 Dec 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|2 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nial J Wheate|
|3 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Oliver Dorigo|
|28 Apr 2017||Author responded||Author comments - sheng zhang|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|28 Apr 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|3 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nial J Wheate|
|18 Aug 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Justin Brown|
|26 Sep 2017||Author responded||Author comments - sheng zhang|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|26 Sep 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|29 Sep 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Justin Brown|
|1 Dec 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Fei Liang|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|1 Dec 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|8 Dec 2017||Editorially accepted|
|19 Dec 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12885-017-3902-4|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.