Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Risk of second primary cancers in cancer patients treated with cisplatin: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized studies

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
31 Dec 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
2 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nial J Wheate
3 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Oliver Dorigo
28 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - sheng zhang
Resubmission - Version 2
28 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nial J Wheate
18 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Justin Brown
26 Sep 2017 Author responded Author comments - sheng zhang
Resubmission - Version 3
26 Sep 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
29 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Justin Brown
1 Dec 2017 Author responded Author comments - Fei Liang
Resubmission - Version 4
1 Dec 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
8 Dec 2017 Editorially accepted
19 Dec 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12885-017-3902-4

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement