Risk of second primary cancers in cancer patients treated with cisplatin: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized studies
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|31 Dec 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|2 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nial J Wheate|
|3 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Oliver Dorigo|
|28 Apr 2017||Author responded||Author comments - sheng zhang|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|28 Apr 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|3 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nial J Wheate|
|18 Aug 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Justin Brown|
|26 Sep 2017||Author responded||Author comments - sheng zhang|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|26 Sep 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|29 Sep 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Justin Brown|
|1 Dec 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Fei Liang|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|1 Dec 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|8 Dec 2017||Editorially accepted|
|19 Dec 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12885-017-3902-4|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.