This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Diagnostic accuracy of 18F–FDG PET/CT and MR imaging in patients with adenoid cystic carcinoma
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 17 January 2017
Accepted: 8 December 2017
Published: 22 December 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|17 Jan 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|22 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gerhard Huber|
|16 Aug 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Verena Ruhlmann|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|16 Aug 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|3 Dec 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Verena Ruhlmann|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|3 Dec 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|8 Dec 2017||Editorially accepted|
|22 Dec 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12885-017-3890-4|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.