This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Dietary supplement use among cancer survivors and the general population: a nation-wide cross-sectional study
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 1 July 2016
Accepted: 8 December 2017
Published: 28 December 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|1 Jul 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|5 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ock K. Chun|
|1 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jane Murphy|
|7 Aug 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Sihan Song|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|7 Aug 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|25 Sep 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ock K. Chun|
|8 Oct 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jane Murphy|
|6 Dec 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Sihan Song|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|6 Dec 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|8 Dec 2017||Editorially accepted|
|28 Dec 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12885-017-3885-1|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.