Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Perceptions of colorectal cancer screening and recommendation behaviors among physicians in Korea

  • Hye Young Shin1, 3,
  • Mina Suh1,
  • Boyoung Park2,
  • Jae Kwan Jun1 and
  • Kui Son Choi2Email author
BMC Cancer201717:860

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3881-5

Received: 16 February 2017

Accepted: 7 December 2017

Published: 16 December 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
16 Feb 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
29 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Christian von Wagner
12 Sep 2017 Author responded Author comments - Hye Young Shin
Resubmission - Version 2
12 Sep 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
21 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Hye Young Shin
Resubmission - Version 3
21 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
7 Dec 2017 Editorially accepted
16 Dec 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12885-017-3881-5

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Centre, Goyang, Republic of Korea
(2)
Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Centre, Goyang-si, Republic of Korea
(3)
College of Nursing, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Advertisement