This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
The prognosis of invasive micropapillary carcinoma compared with invasive ductal carcinoma in the breast: a meta-analysis
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 24 May 2017
Accepted: 28 November 2017
Published: 11 December 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|24 May 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|22 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Abeer Shaaban|
|7 Sep 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hugh Carmalt|
|8 Sep 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Thaer Khoury|
|28 Oct 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Yun Wu|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|28 Oct 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|5 Nov 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hugh Carmalt|
|5 Nov 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Abeer Shaaban|
|23 Nov 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Yun Wu|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|23 Nov 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|28 Nov 2017||Editorially accepted|
|11 Dec 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12885-017-3855-7|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.