Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

The prognosis of invasive micropapillary carcinoma compared with invasive ductal carcinoma in the breast: a meta-analysis

Contributed equally
BMC Cancer201717:839

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3855-7

Received: 24 May 2017

Accepted: 28 November 2017

Published: 11 December 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
24 May 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
22 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Abeer Shaaban
7 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hugh Carmalt
8 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Thaer Khoury
28 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - Yun Wu
Resubmission - Version 2
28 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
5 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hugh Carmalt
5 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Abeer Shaaban
23 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Yun Wu
Resubmission - Version 3
23 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
28 Nov 2017 Editorially accepted
11 Dec 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12885-017-3855-7

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Breast Surgery, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, People’s Republic of China
(2)
Pathology Tissue Bank, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, People’s Republic of China

Advertisement