Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparison of the association of mammographic density and clinical factors with ductal carcinoma in situ versus invasive ductal breast cancer in Korean women

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
5 Jan 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
14 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sandip Sengupta
7 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Susan Stewart
23 May 2017 Author responded Author comments - Hyeonyoung Ko
Resubmission - Version 2
23 May 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
13 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Susan Stewart
13 Aug 2017 Author responded Author comments - Hyeonyoung Ko
Resubmission - Version 3
13 Aug 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
10 Oct 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Susan Stewart
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
24 Nov 2017 Editorially accepted
5 Dec 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12885-017-3841-0

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement