Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Influences on anticipated time to ovarian cancer symptom presentation in women at increased risk compared to population risk of ovarian cancer

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
1 Jun 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
19 Jul 2016 Author responded Author comments - Stephanie Elizabeth Smits
Resubmission - Version 2
19 Jul 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
23 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Christina M Annunziata
26 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sudeshna Chatterjee
24 Jan 2017 Author responded Author comments - Stephanie Elizabeth Smits
Resubmission - Version 3
24 Jan 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
28 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Roberto Passera
20 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Stephanie Elizabeth Smits
Resubmission - Version 4
20 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
23 Nov 2017 Editorially accepted
4 Dec 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12885-017-3835-y

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement