Skip to main content


Open Peer Review Reports for: Unfavorable impact of cancer cachexia on activity of daily living and need for inpatient care in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in Japan: a prospective longitudinal observational study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
10 Apr 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
14 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Angela Marten
16 Sep 2017 Author responded Author comments - Tateaki Naito
Resubmission - Version 2
16 Sep 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
19 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Angela Marten
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
17 Nov 2017 Editorially accepted
28 Nov 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12885-017-3795-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.