Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Cancer

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

The ANDROMEDA prospective cohort study: predictive value of combined criteria to tailor breast cancer screening and new opportunities from circulating markers: study protocol

BMC Cancer201717:785

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3784-5

Received: 4 August 2017

Accepted: 13 November 2017

Published: 22 November 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
4 Aug 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
15 Sep 2017 Author responded Author comments - Livia Giordano
Resubmission - Version 2
15 Sep 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
10 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Livia Giordano
Resubmission - Version 3
10 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
13 Nov 2017 Editorially accepted
22 Nov 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12885-017-3784-5

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Centre for Cancer Prevention (CPO Piemonte), Unit of Epidemiology and Screening, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza of Turin
(2)
Unity of Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e Cura dei Tumori, IRCCS
(3)
Edo & Elvo Tempia Foundation

Advertisement