Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Treatment recommendations within the leeway of clinical guidelines: A qualitative interview study on oncologists’ clinical deliberation

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
10 Apr 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
5 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Oluwaseun Adebayo Bamodu
11 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Takeo Nakayama
18 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Ina Otte
Resubmission - Version 2
18 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
28 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Oluwaseun Adebayo Bamodu
16 Aug 2017 Author responded Author comments - Ina Otte
Resubmission - Version 3
16 Aug 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
4 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - Ina Otte
Resubmission - Version 4
4 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
31 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - Ina Otte
Resubmission - Version 5
31 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
13 Nov 2017 Editorially accepted
21 Nov 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12885-017-3783-6

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement